By Michael Barthorp
Hardcover e-book with dirt jacket, now not depicted, is an background of the Boer Wars. Many illustrations. writer is Michael Barthorp.
Read or Download The Anglo-Boer Wars: The British and the Afrikaners 1815-1902 PDF
Best africa books
Drawing on bills from India to Africa and California to Tennessee, and on study in neuroscience, psychology, and animal habit, G. A. Bradshaw explores the minds, feelings, and lives of elephants. Wars, hunger, mass culls, poaching, and habitat loss have decreased elephant numbers from greater than ten million to a couple hundred thousand, leaving orphans bereft of the elders who would typically mentor them.
- Physicians, Colonial Racism, and Diaspora in West Africa
- Decentralisation in Africa : A Pathway out of Poverty and Conflict? (European Association of Development Institutes Publications)
- Churchill and the Mad Mullah of Somaliland
- The Wretched of the Earth
Extra resources for The Anglo-Boer Wars: The British and the Afrikaners 1815-1902
Women, unlike men, possessed the capacity to cultivate life within their bellies or wombs. It was this capacity that situated women’s councils as the ritual guardians of the land’s fecundity and young women’s fertility. Within households, senior men exerted substantial control over women and girls as well as junior men and boys by commanding deference, acting as family spokespersons and guardians within the wider community, and presiding over most transactions involving land and livestock. Men’s councils similarly commanded the authority to make and enforce decisions on a wide range of issues that affected both men and women.
The colonial politics of the womb conﬂated concerns about improving women’s status with efforts to encourage population growth and expand the availability of cheap labor. It also conﬂated sexuality with reproduction. More so than either the black peril scares or efforts to stop concubinage, campaigns aimed at ending female excision and promoting hospital births left little room for considering sex as something distinct from procreation. These campaigns located intimate relations as key to the survival and prosperity of “tribes,” the Kenya colony, and the British empire.
On the one hand, it allowed for a wide range of women, from the conservative Duchess of Atholl to women’s rights advocate Eleanor Rathbone, to support a prohibition. On the other, it limited their condemnation to the “major” form, as the “minor” form was not found to produce scar tissue that could lead to complications during childbirth. Like Protestant missionaries, women activists only obliquely addressed the potential sexual consequences of the procedure. According to Pedersen, these women lacked a “forthright (and anatomically explicit) public rhetoric” through which to deﬁne the clitoris as a sexual organ; the reproductive framing of excision prevailed because it was easier to defend women as mothers than as sexual beings.